Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Premier Clark Votes No Confidence in her own Government

As my faithful readers know, I've been using this blog to aggregate media on the BC Liberals for some time and yes, to rant and rave. But here in BC, we've gotten to a whole new level where I couldn't even make this $h!t up if I tried.

Our own Premier, Christy Clark, has actually given her own government a vote of No Confidence in explaining why she is refusing to call the Legislature back into session for a fall sitting. If the Premier and leader of the majority government isn't responsible for carrying out the mandate and creating the culture of the Legislature then who the hell is?

I can only surmise that this was one of those unscripted moments where her media wranglers were notably absent and she went off the speaking points that had been carefully prepared for her. They must have some sort of code word for this by now.

Now, going into an election year, I suppose it will be helpful for the voters of Victoria to be fully aware that their Premier and the "leader" of the BC Liberals does not consider them to be "real people." I'm not exactly sure what she would consider them to be, but the dehumanization of the population of an entire city is pretty clear in spite of what spin they're now trying to put on her very honest and sincere comments.

Some relevant facts:
  • The BC legislature only sat for 48 days last year. 
  • The legislature recessed on Thursday, May 31, 2012 almost four months ago.  
  • A fall session of the BC legislature was scheduled to be in operation for only 28 days in October and November 2012.
  • The BC Liberal government apparently plans to cut spending by $241 million this year and $398 million next year to meet budget targets. 
  • It will be almost 9 months between sittings of the Legislature under Clark's leadership. 
  • A provincial election is scheduled for May 14, 2013.
**************************************
Here are some choice excerpts:

Hutchinson first reported her comments at the end of the summer, but they surfaced again this week in the context of Clark’s decision not to hold a fall session of the Legislature.
She told him: “When the House rises at the end of [May], you’re never going to find me in Victoria.

“I try never to go over there. Because it’s sick. It’s a sick culture. All they can think about is government and there are no real people in Victoria, and you get captured by this inside-the-beltway debate, and it’s really unhealthy.”

Finance Minister Mike de Jong gave a more persuasive and less flattering explanation for the lack of a session when he told reporters recently that it was cancelled because Clark restocked her Cabinet with rookies who need time to learn their portfolios and the government wanted to continue the work started last summer of “reaching out to British Columbians.”

In other words, it lacks the competence at the moment to face the opposition in question period and would rather spend the time campaigning.

It’s not unusual for a fall sitting to be cancelled. But to assert that time spent conducting the formal business of the government would be a waste of time better spent “listening” to the common folk represents a new level of contempt for the political process.

What’s most disturbing is that the contempt is being shown by the one person who is in the best position to improve the “sick culture” and make it more productive.

Or who would be if she had any desire to make it a more effective institution. That doesn’t seem to be on her fall agenda, however.

**************************************
 
Some people will say anything to get elected, why the change of heart? Which statements are true? How do you trust someone who changes their spots so fast? Or is there another agenda and isn't that as bad, or worse? See de Jong above.
 
 
While running for the B.C. Liberal party leadership in 2011, Clark "told reporters she loved the daily cutandthrust of question period. After she won the party leadership, she expressed a desire to run in a byelection as quickly as possible to get her seat in the house. "As you know, I love question period and I hate to miss it," she told reporters.
When Clark was resigning as an MLA in 2005, during her first stint in office, she also professed love for the job in her last speech in the chamber.

"I have a deep, deep love of politics. I love question period. I love debate. I love the people I've met. I even love the protesters. I love politics."
 
Some response:
 
It's little wonder that the Liberals have little support on Vancouver Island if they think the people who live here are part of a sick culture," said John Horgan, NDP MLA for Juan de Fuca.

**************************************

An open letter to B.C. Premier Christy Clark

I thought I'd write to you about your decision to cancel your provincial legislature's fall sitting.You were supposed to face opposition parties for seven weeks at Question Period and now — nothing.
 
Your Finance Minister Mike de Jong explained the rationale: 
 
"The government will be preoccupied over the next number of months in terms of the preparation of the budget blueprint, and continuing what began in the summer and reaching out to British Columbians. That will be the focus for the government."
Is it really too much for citizens to want their leaders to focus on key issues and reaching out — whatever that means — while being held accountable in their own legislature?

Your government hasn't faced the electorate since you won that byelection and became Premier and you do have an election scheduled for May 14, 2013.

So, what's the message here?

That the government doesn't want to hear from opposition parties during a time of deep austerity and cuts?

Or that the government does so little of consequence that there's no need to meet about its activities? Not a lot of good options.

From Twitter:


Premier Clark forced to explain remarks about Victoria


But will they be real people? RT : Next week will see an extra 1500 -1700 politicians in town to attend the UBCM 

Skills training plan could have been good news for Clark, but b/c of her sick Victoria comments, it was derailed.

Carole James says Premier Clark should step down if she doesn't want to come to Capital, legislature
  

Monday, September 10, 2012

BC Liberals & Conservatives: Struggles to Attract Credible Candidates



Premier Christy Clark is “re-structuring” her cabinet, but a more pressing challenge for her is finding enough credible candidates to carry her party’s tarnished banner in the next election.

The B.C. Conservatives, on the other hand, have yet to demonstrate they possess a disciplined, seasoned process to oversee an election campaign. Cummins once expressed concern to me on a Shaw Voice of B.C. program that his party would attract the wrong kind of candidate who could prove embarrassing.

As I wrote here previously, the B.C. Conservatives have to inoculate themselves from “bozo eruptions” from candidates in the middle of a campaign. They can derail any campaign momentum rather quickly.

Indeed, Cummins himself has just provided the exact kind of comment I’m talking about. In an interview with the Vancouver Sun’s Jonathon Fowlie last week, Cummins compared himself to Jesus Christ no less.

In talking about facing a potential challenge to his leadership, Cummins said he could find only one party board member who wanted him gone. Then, he added this gem of a quote: “I hate to use a Biblical reference but Christ had 12 apostles, and one turned him in. We share the same initials but I can’t rise from the dead and I can’t get unanimity on the board. I wouldn’t expect to be able to. He couldn’t. I can’t.”

Clark’s potential problem when it comes to candidate recruitment is a little different. While Cummins is asking people to come on board a new venture, where the expectations might not be so high, Clark is trying to convince people to jump aboard a ship that is listing badly and seems likely to go under, or at least not right itself any time soon. 

While her predecessor, Gordon Campbell, could woo “star” candidates such as Carole Taylor, Wally Oppal, Margaret McDermiad, Kash Heed and Moira Stilwell with the offer of a cabinet post, Clark is not in a position to do that.

The best she can offer, right now at least, is the chance to be a portfolio critic sitting in the Official Opposition. That’s not the most appealing offer to people who currently have good careers in the private sector.

The one leader sitting in the catbird seat is, of course, the NDP’s Adrian Dix. He’s only losing a handful of MLAs from his caucus (Clark, on the other hand, will lose about 20 sitting MLAs) and his party is well along in the nomination process.

The NDP finds itself in a situation similar to the one it faced in 1991, when it was also heavily favoured to form government. Back then, it got people like Mike Farnworth, Joy MacPhail, Penny Priddy, Andrew Petter, Ujjal Dosanjh and Sue Hammell to run as first-timers, and they all became strong cabinet ministers.

It’s yet another parallel to the pivotal 1991 election, which saw a long-time political dynasty almost disappear from sight. The current premier has a lot of work ahead of her to prevent the same thing happening again next May.

************************************
New BC Liberal-inspired Drinking Game:

Family drinking game

The lushes at K&K have come up with a new drinking game. From now until the provincial election on May 14, 2013, we’re going to drink a shot of Baja Rosa every time Premier Christy Clark or someone in her newly shuffled cabinet says the word “family.”

If we had started this drinking game when Clark and her so-called “families first” agenda was ushered into office, we would have a nice buzz going right now. But with the election looming and Clark desperately trying to make a connection with disillusioned voters, we fully expect to be on the verge of liver failure by the time polls close on election night.
In fact, it’s only been a few days since Clark introduced her new cabinet and we’re already comfortably numb from the sweet nectar of tequila- and strawberry-infused dairy products.

According to the Vancouver Sun, Clark wrote a smiley letter to each of her cabinet members stating: “Our government faces many exciting challenges and opportunities in the months ahead. Our success will be defined by our ability to develop and implement an agenda that connects with the priorities and circumstances of B.C. families.” One shot.

“I have established a cabinet working group on family affordability which will work to find savings, and opportunities to provide some relief for household budgets.” Two shots.

“I urge you to identify specific ideas on how our government can help keep life affordable for families.” Three shots.

“What I’m really focused on are families,” Clark told the media Wednesday. Four shots.

“And there are a lot of families who fit into this category—who just feel like they aren’t getting ahead and they’re worried about their future.” Five shots.

Clark then passed the families first peace pipe to her new finance minister, Mike de Jong, who said: “Where we can reduce the [tax] burden further for families, we will explore that.” Six shots.

Clark then got changed into a cheerleader uniform, grabbed a set of pompoms and performed a cheer. “F-A-M-I-L-I-E-S! What does that spell? Families!”

Admittedly, we were pretty wasted on Baja Rosa by the time that occurred, so we may have hallucinated the whole thing.

Wednesday, September 05, 2012

BC Liberal Dream Team: September 2012


Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. ~ Albert Einstein

So cliched, but can it really go unsaid about the shuffling of the deck chairs on the Titanic? It's the best metaphor, sorry. Don't you just love their spin as "Cabinet Renewal?" It's all so comical. It's like they are all suffering some mass delusion that they have a chance of getting in as a majority again. It's almost sad really, if it weren't for all of the people who've been kicked in the teeth over and over again by the BC Liberal government over the last decade.Oh and those people are us. You know, voters.

It's like a game of political Survivor where people are voting themselves off the island one by one. 

BC Liberals Resign: Sinking Ship Or Fresh Start (TWITTER REACTION)

Huffington Post, , Aug. 30, 2012


                                 


Christy Clark shuffles cabinet
VICTORIA/CKNW (AM980), 9/5/2012

Office of the (Ill-fated) Premier: Premier Christy Clark Announces Cabinet Renewal

VICTORIA - Premier Christy Clark today renewed her cabinet with a focus on a strong and growing economy, controlling spending and  making life more affordable for families.
"Our government is delivering for British Columbians. This new cabinet brings a renewed commitment to our priorities," said Premier Clark. "That means staying focused on jobs and fiscal discipline and continuing our efforts to make life more affordable for B.C. families. I have directed each minister to stay focused on these priorities."

The new Cabinet is made up of 16 ministers and two ministers of state, plus the Premier. No new ministries have been added, keeping the size of the Cabinet smaller than pre-2011 levels.

There is a new cabinet working group focused on family affordability, and the cabinet committee on jobs and economic growth now includes skills training. A full listing of the cabinet committees and membership is attached in the backgrounder.

The new cabinet is:
* Premier - Hon. Christy Clark
* Minister of Energy, Mines and Natural Gas and Minister Responsible
for Housing and Deputy Premier- Hon. Rich Coleman
* Minister of Finance and House Leader - Hon. Mike de Jong
* Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation - Hon. Ida
Chong
* Minister of Advanced Education, Innovation and Technology and
Minister Responsible for Multiculturalism - Hon. John Yap
* Minister of Agriculture - Hon. Norm Letnick
* Minister of Children and Family Development - Hon. Stephanie
Cadieux
* Minister of Citizens' Services and Open Government - Hon. Ben
Stewart
* Minister of Community, Sport and Cultural Development - Hon. Bill
Bennett
* Minister of Education - Hon. Don McRae
* Minister of Environment - Hon. Terry Lake
* Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations - Hon.
Steve Thomson
* Minister of Health - Hon. Margaret MacDiarmid
* Minister of Jobs, Tourism and Skills Training and Minister
Responsible for Labour - Hon. Pat Bell
* Minister of Justice and Attorney General - Hon. Shirley Bond
* Minister of Social Development - Hon. Moira Stilwell
* Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure - Hon. Mary Polak
* Minister of State for Seniors - Hon. Ralph Sultan
* Minister of State for Small Business - Hon. Naomi Yamamoto

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Voters see the truth: BC Liberals becoming more & more unpopular




Each logo represents a donation of over $7,500 to Clark's 2011 leadership campaign. They represent over $200,000 in donations and don't include donations these companies may have made to the BC Liberal party in 2011. The NDP set a donation cap of $2,500. 
 
The credit card expenditures of Officers of the Legislature and Ministries for 2010 – 2011 and 2011 – 2012.

**************************** 

Keith Baldrey, Vancouver Courier August 8, 2012

The bad news just keeps accumulating for Premier Christy Clark and the B.C. Liberals, and there's little to suggest that pattern is going to change in their favour anytime soon.

The latest disappointment for them is the latest Angus Reid poll, which shows Clark and her gang got absolutely no bounce in the polls from her pipeline announcement. Indeed, it is the NDP that is growing in popularity, while the B.C. Liberals are stuck in the polls, unable to get any traction at all with the voters.

The poll followed on the heels of revelations of increased credit card spending in a number of government ministries, including Clark's office. 

The breakdown of the poll's other findings reveal just what a bleak situation the B.C. Liberals find themselves in. Pick a category -region, gender, income level, age demo-graphics-and the party trails in pretty well everything.

For example, just 15 per cent of decided female voters say they would back B.C.'s female premier and her party-an astounding finding. The NDP also leads in all three age demographics and among almost all income groups.

The B.C. Liberals have also lost the support of half the people who voted for them in 2009. They trail the NDP in all regions of the province, creating the potential for a scenario similar to the 2001 election results, except in reverse.

As the next election draws nearer, it's a safe bet to assume the bad news will continue to accumulate for the ruling party. The pattern has been set, and there's little chance of it being altered in any great way. Even a change in leadership-as remote a possibility that it is -appears unlikely to right their ship. 
 
****************************  
All's fair game in love and politics 

Michael Smyth, The Province August 5, 2012

After last week's uproar over Christy Clark's credit-card bills, and the financial farce that passes for secretive MLA expense accounts, the political blame game has begun.

Now the ugliest fight is between the Liberals and upstart B.C. Conservatives, who are calling on the Liberal speaker of the legislature, Bill Barisoff, to resign over the whole secrets-pending mess.

Shortly after Conservative leader John Cummins called for Barisoff's head, the Liberals called me to tear a strip off John van Dongen, the former Liberal MLA who jumped to the Conservatives in March.

Better put on a raincoat, dear reader - the mudslinging gets down and dirty from here.

Krueger has three part-time constituency assistants in Kamloops. In November 2010, one of them was hired as his "executive assistant" at the legislature. Then Premier Christy Clark dumped Krueger from cabinet in March 2011, and his executive assistant was let go and given $73,000 in severance.

In March 2012, Krueger rehired her as his constituency assistant.
It was one of the more eye-popping items on Premier Christy Clark's credit-card statement: $3,267.66 at the Ferris Oyster Bar in Victoria.

That was the bill for a reception Clark threw for Canada's premiers at a conference last year. The hungry first ministers also chowed down at Vancouver's fancy Bishop's Restaurant, to the tune of $2,279.

As Clark herself said, when denying a raise to B.C. civil servants: "After all, it's taxpayers' money."

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Bafflegab: BC Liberals fiscal (mis)management of taxpayer dollars

bafflegab:[baf-uhl-gab]                        


noun Slang . confusing or generally unintelligible jargon; gobbledegook

I'm a bit confused about what government Premier Clark is talking about here:

“What we have to count on is that our vote is going to come together. And if people care about good government, open government, family government, government that creates jobs, government that respects your money and treats it the way that you would, then you have to remember that we have to come together.”
Vancouver Courier, Mike Howell, July 25, 2012.
 
Is this the government she's referring to, the one she & the incompetent BC Liberals have been in charge of since 2001:
 
Auditor general says finances of B.C. legislature are a mess
Doyle released a scathing audit Thursday that pointed to a host of financial irregularities and failures at the legislative assembly, which has a budget of almost $70 million for staff, MLA salaries and expenses, security, a library, dining room and gift shop.

“It’s really bad,” Doyle said. When asked if he could conclude whether the legislature had lost any money or spent it improperly, Doyle replied: “We don’t know.”

Doyle said his auditors had to adjust the legislature’s books by $1.3 billion. “That’s how far wrong they were in what they were doing,” he said.


Legislature financial staff had not reconciled their records with their bank accounts in years, resulting, in one case, of records showing the legislature $133 million in overdraft while the actual bank account sat at $0, he said.

The audit also found that taxpayers have been paying off MLA credit cards, used for travel expenses, without proper documentation — likely totalling hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.
 
Barisoff described the audit as a difference in “accounting procedures” and a personality conflict between Doyle and legislative comptroller Dan Arbic.

“I think the Speaker might not appreciate the gravity of the findings, and hasn’t yet quite worked out what this means properly, and what his responsibilities are,” Doyle replied.

Times Colonist, July 27, 2012.

How can we expect B.C.’s finances to be handled competently and honestly if the elected officials themselves can’t account for their own expenses?

In his audit of the B.C. legislature’s finances, auditor general John Doyle has revealed neglect and incompetence of scandalous proportions. No one, it seems, has kept proper track of the legislature’s annual budget of nearly $70 million for years.

Because of the accumulated neglect over that period, Doyle said his auditors had to adjust the books by $1.3 billion. At one point, records showed the legislature had a $133-million overdraft while the actual bank balance was zero. Taxpayers have been paying off the credit cards MLAs use for travel expenses without proper documentation.

Because the accounting has been so shoddy, Doyle doesn’t know if the legislature has lost any money or if it has been spent improperly. In other words, it’s so bad, he can’t tell how bad it is.

The day-to-day operation of the legislature is the responsibility of the legislature clerk, who reports to the legislative assembly management committee, chaired by Speaker Bill Barisoff. That committee has had only two 20-minute meetings in 12 months. Fingers can legitimately be pointed at the legislature’s financial staff — surely, these are professionals who understand basic accounting procedures — but the ultimate blame rests with the elected officials.

*********************
John Doyle deserves the Order of BC for his work in fulfilling his mandate to the citizens of B.C.

Saturday, June 02, 2012

Changes to Privacy Rights of Citizens of BC

Why did the BC Liberal government move so quickly to ram through poorly thought out changes to BC's privacy laws? Who benefits and who doesn't?

BC Freedom of Information & Privacy Association, June 1st, 2012 11:30am

There has been a lot of discouraging news on the FOI and privacy front recently as a raft of new legislation introduced in the last couple of weeks undercuts the law protecting our FOI and privacy rights.

All four bills have been criticized by provincial Information and Privacy Commissioner Elizabeth Denham in an unprecedented barrage of letters from her office. Yet her concerns, along with those raised by FIPA and others, have fallen on deaf ears. Questions about why changes to institutions like PharmaCare require an expansion in the government’s ability to collect, use, and disclose sensitive personal information, similarly, have gone unanswered.

FIPA has just sent a letter to Premier Clark asking why her government feels it necessary to undertake this piecemeal repeal of the information rights of British Columbians. The full text of that letter can be downloaded as a PDF here.

For some background on the controversy that has arisen over this legislation, and what FIPA has been saying about it, check out the following links:

BILL 35:
Drug bill includes personal information grab: advocate, from The Tyee
Bill easing research access to ehealth data sparks privacy fears, from The Vancouver Sun

BILL 37:
BC commissioner critical of animal health secrecy measures, from The Tyee
Government Moving to Keep Farm Disease Outbreaks Secret, from The Tyee

BILL 39:
New Bills Smack of Big Brother, from The Times Colonist

BILL 47:
Elizabeth Denham’s letter to Minister Lekstrom regarding Bill 47, Coastal Ferries Amendment Act

GENERAL:
Christy Clark repealing transparency and privacy rights: FIPA, from The Tyee

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Those Nasty BC Liberals: Democracy, pffft, Who Needs It?

There will only be one more session in the fall. The campaigning is going to be starting to ramp up in what will be the last election in which the BC Liberals have a majority and death grip on B.C.
Word: Spencer Chandra Herbert (Spencer Herbert):
Christy Clark, and her BC Liberal government have decided that changing laws which affect your employment, your health, your privacy, your transportation, your finances, and your environment only needs to take 30 minutes of debate per bill all in a mad rush to close down the legislature today and avoid any real scrutiny. It's bad government full stop. A change in government can't come soon enough.  
With session ending Thursday, B.C. Liberals cut short debates on legislation
The Liberal government used its majority to cut short debate on 13 pieces of legislation, in an attempt to pass them all into law by the time the legislature adjourns for summer break Thursday. Most will get between 30 and 60 minutes of debate by MLAs before a snap vote is called by the Liberal majority.
***********************
Video: Premier Clark defends BC hydro rate increase
She keeps spinning that they were asking for a 50% increase, when it was only 32% and other inaccuracies too.What this means is she and her media people think all of us are simpletons and they can confuse us with sophistry. Can you smell the desperation? It smells like a party in its' death throws.
************************
BC’s Top Investigative Reporter Bob Mackin Pulls Back the Curtain on Liquor Distribution: What Were Minister Rich Coleman and His Good Friend and Political Confidante Patrick Kinsella Talking About?
In obtaining an internal memo, Business In Vancouver columnist Bob Mackin has peeled back the curtain on the machinations by one particular bidder–a bidder represented by Premier Chirsty Clark’s rainmaker, Pat Kinsella.

Tuesday, May 08, 2012

There was a Time When Democracy and Charter Rights meant something in BC: Not to BC Liberals Apparently

This is close to the cold, dark heart of BC Liberals Suck since the minions of the ill-fated government made a complaint to Elections Canada about our humble blog last election. 

Why does Big Brother need to shut down democracy in BC? A healthy and functional democracy doesn't fear citizens having a voice and a forum.

Election law crushes small spenders

VINCENT GOGOLEK, SHANNON DAUB AND MICHEAL VONN, Special to the Sun May 7, 2012

http://www.vancouversun.com/opinion/Election+crushes+small+spenders/6581861/story.html

The British Columbia government wants you to shut up during the next election.
That’s the message that emerges when you read between the lines of its proposed amendments to the Election Act.

Premier Christy Clark claims she is trying to prevent Big Money from buying provincial elections. Her government has reintroduced a controversial measure to limit “third party election advertising” before the start of a provincial election campaign.

But what the premier doesn’t mention is that the Election Act requires third parties to register with Elections BC before they are even allowed to speak up.

Given the extremely broad definition of election advertising in the act, this is a serious problem. Here is that definition (from section 228 of the act): “the transmission to the public by any means, during the period beginning 60 days before a campaign period and ending at the end of the campaign period, of an advertising message that promotes or opposes, directly or indirectly, a registered political party or the election of a candidate, including an advertising message that takes a position on an issue with which a registered political party or candidate is associated ...”

In other words, just about any public communication on any provincial issue under the sun. Failure to register as an “election advertising sponsor” means you will have committed an offence, and will be liable to up to a year in jail and a $10,000 fine.

It gets worse. You don’t have to spend a single cent to be caught by a law that claims to be about reducing the influence of Big Money.

According to Elections BC’s website, “Election advertising sponsors must be registered with the Chief Electoral Officer, even if the election advertising they are conducting does not cost any money.”

This law poses a real danger to engaged citizens and small organizations who may spend a few dollars (or even no dollars) communicating with their neighbours or the wider public. Want to put a sign in your window about an issue you have an opinion about? Better register with Elections BC first. A community organization wants to talk about its concerns on Facebook? Register first.

Research we conducted with social movement groups after the 2009 provincial election found:

• The prospect of being publicly labelled as a “third party advertising sponsor” created anxiety for many non-profits, charities and other organizations that are careful to remain non-partisan, with some simply choosing to opt out of public engagement during the election entirely.
• One in four of the groups that participated in our study self-censored as a result of the rules. Six groups censored public communication activities specifically to avoid having to register as advertising sponsors. Others self-censored due to confusion and/or concerns about the risks of inadvertently breaking the rules.
• Most of the activities groups censored had little to do with commercial advertising. For example, nine groups did not post new material on their websites; four removed existing material from their websites; and four refrained from issuing or endorsing a call for changes to government policy.
• Particularly troubling is the revelation that five groups avoided commenting in the mainstream media due to confusion about the rules (media commentary is one of a few exemptions from the definition of advertising).

Other parts of Canada with third-party spending limits don’t require registration until you spend at least a minimum amount. Usually this minimum amount is $500; in Alberta it is $1,000. Having a minimum spending threshold reduces the risk to small groups or individuals who just want to speak out about an issue that is important to them.
Without a minimum threshold, in practice B.C.’s rules focus mainly on these small spenders. Of the 232 organizations registered as third-party sponsors during the 2009 B.C. election, more than half (59 per cent) spent less than $500, and three quarters spent less than $3,000.

The requirement to register before you spend a dime targets the involved, active citizen that every democracy is supposed to be encouraging. And it targets small organizations, many of which represent the least powerful people in our society, whose voices are already marginalized. At a time when voter participation is falling, this law is not only unjustifiable, it is also profoundly destructive to democracy.

In his 2010 report to the Legislature, the chief electoral officer noted the problem of not having a minimum spending threshold given the sweeping definition of election advertising. He suggested legislators consider making changes. Apparently the government either forgot about his report, or decided to ignore it.

In all likelihood, the current rules are an unconstitutional restriction on freedom of speech, and likely also of freedom of association.

Instead of resurrecting the controversial “pre-campaign period,” the provincial government should set a reasonable minimum registration threshold so that the rules no longer target small spenders.

If the government is unwilling to do so, then it should at least seek an opinion from the B.C. Court of Appeal on the constitutionality of requiring third parties to register before they can even speak up.

After all, the small spenders can’t afford to launch a costly court challenge.
Vincent Gogolek is executive director of B.C.’s Freedom of Information and Privacy Association, Shannon Daub is communications director with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and Micheal Vonn is the B.C. Civil Liberties Association’s policy director. Together they co-published the 2010 study Election Chill Effect: The Impact of B.C.’s New Third Party Advertising Rules on Social Movement Groups.

Monday, March 14, 2011

BC Liberals Latest Dream Team

Premier Christy Clark was sworn in today, March 14th, in Victoria as BC's 35th Premier.

Clark's New Dream Team Cabinet:
  • Kevin Falcon, Deputy Premier and Minister of Finance. (Ed: keep your enemies closer?)
  • Mary Polak, Minister of Aboriginal Relations.
  • Naomi Yamamoto, Minister of Advanced Education.
  • Don McRae, Minister of Agriculture.
  • Barry Penner, Attorney General.
  • Mary McNeil, Minister of Children and Family Development.
  • Ida Chong, Minister Community Sport and Cultural Development.
  • George Abbott, Minister of Education.
  • Rich Coleman, Minister of Energy and Mines and Minister Responsible for Housing.
  • Terry Lake, Minister of Environment.
  • Steve Thomson, Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations.
  • Mike de Jong, Minister of Health.
  • Pat Bell, Minister of Jobs, Tourism and Innovation.
  • Stephanie Cadieux, Minister of Labour, Citizens Services and Open Government.
  • Shirley Bond, Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General.
  • Harry Bloy, Minister of Social Development and Minister Responsible for Multiculturalism.
  • Blair Lekstom, Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure.
  • Rich Coleman will serve as the Government House Leader.
  • Terry Lake will be the deputy Government House Leader.
  • Ben Stewart will be the Government whip.
Other changes the Sun points out:
  • "Five members of the last cabinet are gone: Colin Hansen, Murray Coell, Moira Stilwell, John Yap and Margaret MacDiarmid."
  • Clark brought energy, mines together into one portfolio.
  • She linked forestry, lands and natural resource operations under its own ministry.
  • Created a new ministry of Jobs, Tourism and Innovation.
  • New ministry of Labour, Citizens’ services and Open Government
Some choices quotes:

"Now it’s time for our government to reach out to those families for whom the great promise of British Columbia may have remained elusive. and that works starts now.”

She promised “real and tangible” steps in coming weeks to help families, and said government will be more open and explain its decisions to British Columbians.

**************
New Premier Names Her Cabinet
CBC News, March 14th, 2011.

Clark cut the size of cabinet from 23 to 18, including herself, meaning a large number former premier Gordon Campbell's ministers will now be sitting on the backbenches of the legislature.

Clark also named another 10 MLAs as parliamentary secretaries to work with ministers to focus on key initiatives of government.

Amongst those who did not get a seat at the cabinet table were former deputy premeir and finance minister Colin Hansen, and Kevin Krueger.

*****************

Moira Stilwel Sidelined in Christy Clark's Cabinet, Sources Say

Gary Mason & Ian Bailey, Globe & Mail, March 14, 2011.

Excerpts:

Dr. Stilwell, a former cabinet minister, will not be one of Ms. Clark’s ministers. Instead, she will be named parliamentary secretary in charge of innovation. She will have a reporting relationship with the minister in charge of a newly-created portfolio for jobs.

Dr. Stilwell’s demotion is surprising. A physician trained in nuclear medicine, Dr. Stilwell is one of the brightest minds in the Liberal caucus.

She was one of Mr. Campbell’s must trustworthy ministers and performed well in colleges and regional economic development, the last post she held before resigning to run for the Liberal leadership. But it was during her unlikely bid for the leadership that Dr. Stilwell shone, impressing many with her thoughtful and articulate responses on a range of policy topics.

As the ink dries on the new government letterheads, we all have no choice but to wait and see how all of this is going to play out for BC citizens.

Next up - when & where will Premier Clark run in a by-election and who will run against her from the NDP?

Friday, February 11, 2011

BC Liberals Bring the Blood Sport of Politics to a New Height

Oh boy, they weren't kidding when they said politics is a blood sport. The daggers are out, well, when they aren't being plunged into each others' backs during the leadership contests with both the BC Liberals and BC NDP.

This Facebook page has started up to Celebrate Gordon Campbell's last day as Premier - February 26th.

Here's some fun quotes as the race closes in to a finish.

From George Abbott on Christy Clark:

"Clark's HST flip-flop proves she has no credible plan for B.C.," read his press release. "On this significant issue, the public wants certainty and clarity, not more doublespeak and misdirection." Getting more biting in the media interviews, Abbott accused her of "adopting the Kama Sutra of HST positions." (Ed: AWESOME line!).

Her subsequent preference for tying health care funding to the rate of economic growth brought another blast from Ungentle George: "Unrealistic and oversimplified."

Nor was he even slightly amused at the Clark campaign prank of signing up a cat as a party member: "While Ms. Clark's campaign may consider this a joke, it is actually an example of outright fraud."

The summing up: "More and more it is abundantly clear that Ms. Clark's positions are simply not credible, and it shows that she has no real plan for our province, our economy, or our families."

"Ms. Clark's past actions do little to inspire confidence in her ability to unify the party. She walked away from government seven years ago, leaving the party to rebuild on its own, and only returned when there was the opportunity to be in charge. Today, she will not even commit to running as a B.C. Liberal MLA unless she gets to be premier."

From Vaughan Palmer

Ms. Clark has given me such a plethora of issues to work with,” Mr. Abbott, who resigned as education minister to seek his party’s leadership, said Thursday. “If anybody thinks I should give a free ticket to Christy for whatever reason, they’re wrong. Whatever Christy says is fair game for debate, and that’s what I intend to do.”

He said he has taken Kevin Falcon, another of the six B.C. Liberal leadership candidates, to task for suggesting merit pay for teachers.
(Ian Bailey).

Other campaign news:

Leadership candidate George Abbott released a statement Saturday saying a vendor that works for his campaign created the kitties4christy.com website that poked fun at contender Christy Clark's campaign upon discovering that a cat owned by someone on her team received a party membership card.

Olympia Marie Wawryk, was signed up as a member in December. If her membership had gone unchallenged, the cat would have been eligible to cast a ballot in the party’s Feb. 26 leadership vote. And because the vote is being conducted by telephone and over the Internet, the party may never have known that Olympia is a cat. Kristy Wawryk, a senior volunteer in the Clark leadership campaign, is Olympia’s owner. Initially, Ms. Wawryk identified Olympia as a great-aunt, but the Clark campaign later said the cat had been signed up as a prank...
(Brenda Bouw and Justine Hunter).

On Tuesday, Kevin Falcon admitted a backer had signed up members of the Kamloops Blazers hockey team without their knowledge.

"It's wrong and I don't like it at all. My father was a stretcher-bearer at D-Day. I take democracy very seriously and it really bugs me that people fool around with something so important," Krueger said.

(CBC News).

Falcon's campaign manager, Norman Stowe, has revealed a Falcon supporter signed up several members of the Kamloops Blazers junior hockey team.

Problem is, the players didn't know anything about it.

(CBC News)

Special mention for Mike Smyth's excellent blog title:
Two minutes for Unsportsmanlike sign up!

Runner up to Rod Mickleburgh:

How to Win Friends (not really) and Influence People (a little)

You cheat. No, you cheat. You’re full of it. No, you are. You signed up a cat. No, I didn’t. Okay, I did, but you made fun of it. Et cetera. Welcome to the latest political soap opera: As the Fur Flies.

Which, among the following, is worst?

1. Admitting that you signed up a cat

2. Denying that you signed up a cat.

3. Registering members of a losing Kamloops hockey team, including a player named Dalibor Bortnak, without their knowledge.

4. Making a series of lame jokes about option 3, such as “two minutes for failing to cross-check” and “two minutes for not looking too good.”

****************************

Mike de Jong has become the first of the BC Liberal leadership contenders to disclose the total of donations to his campaign.

The spending limit for candidates in the leadership race is $450,000. Mr. de Jong says he has received $266,450 in donations.

In a statement Friday, the former attorney-general said his donations came from 181 individuals and organizations.

(Ian Bailey)

I guess there won't be too many Valentine cards changing hands amongst the candidates on Monday.

Keep the fun times rolling candidates, you're amusing all of Canada with your antics and we can all use some laughs about now.

Thursday, February 03, 2011

Ain't that the Scary Liberal Truth: Dogs Over Babies

We here at BC Liberals Suck love animals as much as the next person. The sled dog cull is an atrocity and we hope that those responsible face animal cruelty and criminal charges. But when the BC Liberals can ignore the mounting death toll from BC's child welfare system and report after report about the devastating conditions so many of the most vulnerable kids face in their struggle to survive it's just too much.

21 babies who might still be here were less important to the BC Liberal regime that rewarding their senior bureaucrats with "living allowances" and bonuses for keeping staffing levels low and meeting targets out of the Premier's office.

Now they turn around and launch a task force & inquiry when this administration created the conditions where BC has led child poverty in Canada for seven years in a row and the Minister in charge of Children & Families publically states BC doesn't need a poverty reduction plan. This kind of structural violence and negligence towards children protected under the Charter of Rights & Freedoms is what should be under scrutiny and legally actionable.

But some tough talk is reserved for us, as citizens too.
Where are the cries about the dead babies, casualties and collateral damage of a government that set up these conditions?
Where is the inquiry into the children who have died in the care & custody of MCFD/the BC government?
Where is the inquiry into dead children and youth who have been involved with MCFD, or trying to get services from them? Who weren't taken into care & died?
Where is the inquiry into the children who have been critically injured or died in placements that MCFD put them into? Or in Child in Home of Relative homes?

Every single one of us should write our MLA and tell them we won't stand for BC's kids to be treated this way anymore and that unless there is action, they've lost our vote.

Find your MLA here and show that BC's kids mean at least as much as dogs.
**************************

New inquiry raises more questions

VICTORIA/CKNW(AM980)
Charmaine de Silva | Email news tips to charmaine.desilva@corusent.com
2/3/2011

In light of the creation of the task force, some are asking...does the Province care more about dead dogs than dead babies?

The BC NDP's critic for Children and Families, Maurine Karagianis, says its great that the Province has moved quickly to launch the task force into the slaughter of dead dogs near Whistler.

But she has some questions for the Premier, "I'm curious why the Province hasn't taken action yet on the request by the Children's Representative to set up a legislative process for child poverty, and for resources to deal with child death reviews."

Karagianis says the Government's inaction is shameful.

Just last week BC's Child and Youth representative renewed calls for a poverty reduction plan.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Random Thoughts on Who Will Be Our Next Premier: Choose Well Liberal Party, BC is Watching

The knives are unsheathed in the Republic. Politics in BC constantly prove that the truth is always much more compelling, bizarre and interesting than fiction.

So, where are things at? The BC Liberals are all over the place with candidates coming out of the woodwork. In alphabetical order, some random thoughts about the contenders.

George Abbott - He is the guy to watch. He's got a lot of Liberal MLA's supporting him and Liberal member support. He's enough of a moderate and he's preaching the right approach right now to bruised insiders - he will create a more collaborative, kinder and gentler caucus. He's not going to be the big bully that Campbell has been outed to be. He's held enough important Cabinet positions that he's had a chance to demonstrate some degree of administrative experience. He's not been caught up in any big scandals. We don't know of any "special investigators" that have had to be put on the job to look into any unsavoury allegations about him over the past decade. You better believe savvy Liberal strategists know that if Abbott wins for Premier, this will be a deadly blow to the rudderless NDP.

Christy Clark - She's the biggest gift to the NDP right now, as scattered as they are currently. Reading her bio is surreal. She claims to have been a passionate supporter of families in her first term (1996), yet doesn't even mention her ill-fated turn as Minister of Children & Families. She, like a long list before and after her was very unsuccessful in that role and it was like being banished to Siberia sending her there. In fact she had one of the shortest tenures as Minister and played the "family card" when she stepped out of politics when the heat was growing too much over Basi-Virk.

She was absolutely disastrous as Minister of Education and caused a great deal of angst for many while in that role. She wasn't well liked amongst her own cabinet as Deputy Premier, a position she held during the time of the Raid on the Legislature. It's also pretty telling the only support she has from sitting MLA's and former caucus members is Harry Bloy, who has been firmly planted on the back bench even under her own time as a leader in Cabinet.

Clark is also already talking about calling a snap election if she becomes premier. Mark these words, that would spell the end of her political career for good. Since she took her break to "spend more time with her family" in 2005 and since becoming a CKNW hack, she's managed to probably piss off a number of voters. She has no current history of support in whatever riding she will run in.

BC voters are sick & tired of politicians, in general, and even more so for opportunistic ones who figure they can just show up to the party (election), with nothing to back themselves up. Voters want politicians to earn their votes. As Holman notes in the linked article above, she wouldn't even have the support of MLA's in her own party who were only elected in 2005, because some could possibly lose their pensions if they weren't re-elected. And with the HST as the ticking time bomb with voters, it would be a huge risk to go an election in 2011. She would be disastrous to her own Liberal colleagues.

The knives are really being plunged into her back right now too and demonstrating the baggage she lugs behind her to the Premier's chair and the Legislature for the BC Liberal party over the Raid on the Legislature/ Basi-Virk matters.

"To me, it's case closed." Some very damaging words, captured in this video of Clark being asked about her family involvement in this case. For a public that wants an inquiry to find out who in government was involved and responsible for the "sale" of BC Rail and all of the other boondoggling around it this was not a good, nor smart answer. Like Falcon below, it has to have you shaking your head as to why someone with THE most baggage going into this race would want to do this, or think that if they say it's over, it's over for everyone else. This speaks to insight & judgment in a big way.

IMHO, Clark is THE best Premier to lead the BC Liberals into the next election.

Mike De Jong - He's a solid candidate. No apparent dirt, no apparent "special investigations" into his conduct. Appears to be a capable, competent performer as a Cabinet minister. Rather lack lustre, not the most exciting guy, but he's not unlikable, or ruthless like some of the others are known to be. He's also responded to public feedback, such as need for an Inquiry into Missing & Murdered Women in BC.

In an apparent media grab, he was the first to propose lowering the age for voting to 16. I fail to see how this is any way relevant. He's been the Attorney General & in Cabinet for some time & never had this brainstorm before. Does he know something we don't? Has he been secretly polling teenagers? Are they clambering to elect him? It's really a non-issue and all of the candidates are looking foolish for jumping on this train.

Why, oh why, can't politicians hire strategists & communications people who have a clue how things will be perceived by the voting public before setting politicians up to look like idiots?

Kevin Falcon - His blatant attempt to re-brand himself from the ruthless, vicious and uncaring political character he's demonstrated over the last decade by using own child in ads to soften his image is enough to make even the most diehard Liberal groan. For the rest of us - it makes us want to puke until there's nothing left. If he and the mental giants running his campaign think we're all that stupid to believe this leopard can change his spots so quickly then they have drunk the same Kool Aid as the inner circle NDP'ers who thought Carole James stood a chance of winning the next election. Give us all a break.

Political karma is waiting in the wings. Falcon may have strong support with a number of Liberal MLA's, but like the NDP, they all better be thinking strategically, because even if he calls a quick election, his past actions and the disaster that is BC's health care system under his uncaring administration are top of mind for voters, especially outside of the insular urban areas.

He was also disastrously combative in his role as Minister of Transportation. Voters will also be asking themselves whether they really need another real estate developer Premier as the people of BC wonder what happened to all of the prime real estate that has been lost under this administration over the last decade and where the money went?

Like the NDP, Liberal party members better understand this, in spite of his attempts to re-brand himself as "A New Generation of Leadership," he has the stench of the same old BC Liberal party/Socred oldtimers and that will lose this party the next election. The people of BC, including Liberal voters, are hurting and just damn fed up with the way the BC Liberals have been doing things over the last decade. They want change and an end to the status quo of how this government has operated.

From the He Didn't Really Say that Did He? File:

He stated China “really has the ultimate Kevin Falcon government structure,” because “They don't have the labour or environmental restrictions we do. It's not like they have to do community consultations. They just say ‘we're building a bridge’ and they move everyone out of there and get going within two weeks. Could you imagine if we could build like that?”"

Dr. Moira Stilwell - What can you really say? She's obviously a bright, accomplished and successful woman. I don't think anyone is seeing her as a front runner for Premier and it's unclear what support she has amongst her own MLA's, party and colleagues at the Cabinet table. I say good on her for being the first to throw her hat in the ring and going on record for stating she supports raising the minimum wage, it's more than any of her other competitors have said on the matter.

Thursday, December 02, 2010

Love Letters All Around: Welcome to the Banana Republic of BC
















Dan Murphy, The Province.

What absolutely splendid, awkward and interesting times we're having here in the trailer park drama of BC's political scene.

First off, dear readers, I want to thank all of you. Yes, even you PAB lurkers and BC Liberal supporters who seethe at the skewering of your witless leaders. I don't have the time I'd like to devote to discussing all of the reasons I still believe the BC Liberals Suck, although I'm pretty sure most of you have a bunch yourself. So I appreciate that people stop by to see if I have written anything new.

I hope you are finding ways to join the revolution. You know - the one where we make sure our elected officials, of every stripe, gets the fact that they are working for us, using our dollars and we expect a hell of a lot better than we've gotten so far and some things are going to get a change up.

So, after that heartwarming little love letter, let's get ripping, with a bit of a twist.

Who in the hell would ever think we would be getting lessons in leadership, ethics and democracy from the BC Liberals? Definitely not I. But, that's what's happening as they race to lock and load, re-brand and finds them a new leader. Someone who seems new, but is still actually part of the same, tired old party. But, hope springs eternal, even in politics.

Anyone who knows me, knows if I think things aren't working, then I'm a big fan of trying to tear it all apart (in polite society that would include critical analysis and wordy e-mails to people who are pissing me off telling them how things need to change and why). And, when my delightfully tactful and diplomatic methodologies don't find success, then I (figuratively) light the match and scorch things to the ground and help build something new out of the ashes. That's what the BC Liberals are doing right now. It will work, if allowed to.

No doubt inside pressure & Machiavellian scheming was behind Campbell's ignominious admission of defeat (blaming the HST) and announcement he was stepping down as Premier (one of the happiest days BC could have wished for). It's only a loss for the people of Point Grey he will be hanging about until 2013. But I guess that will give the Powers that Be time to get his Directorships worked out. Or whatever his next assignment is now that he's been able to bring BC to its' knees. Carrying out the work of the Man is almost always well rewarded. Campbell need not worry, he is a Made Man.

The Ethical Resisters of the NDP

Beleaguared NDP leader, Carole James and the backroom Silverback hacks are in frantic damage control mode, desperately pulling together an emergency party meeting to try to get the splinter group under control.

Or maybe she's going to drop kick each of them out of the party, if they aren't willing to be "accountable for their behaviour." Booting them out is adding to the rapidly growing list of people she, or her so-called powerbrokers, are punting out of the tent. Isn't that reinforcing the very point the so called "dissidents" are trying to make?

MLA Jenny (Hell ya, I've had enough) Kwan is the most courageous, publically stepping forward, writing a letter and holding a press conference advocating for a one-member one-vote Leadership convention in the NDP. It's escaping me entirely why all the panties are in a bunch over this. When you read the utter nonsense being spouted off by the old school, the fresh voices, ideas and activists of the next wave of NDP leaders become so much more relevant, compelling and necessary.

Why isn't a supposedly democratic organization interested in testing the house, the entire house? This is most important since this hasn't happened once since James became the leader of the party, or lost 2 elections. Hmmm, is Kwan right when she says:

"Under Carole James's leadership, there has been a steady erosion of our democratic principles. Debate has been stifled, decision-making centralized, and individual MLAs marginalized," Kwan said in her statement, adding she thinks the party has also suffered from a "lack of direction" under James.

See a CBC News story on Kwan here. She denies she is interested in running for the leadership of the NDP and explains she is motivated to take this position because of what she is hearing "on the streets."

Statement from Jenny Kwan, MLA, Vancouver-Mt. Pleasant
Dec. 1, 2010.

Kwan isn't wrong either, nor is this about her Wrath, in spite of what some clever political creatures might think. Ask anyone outside the ever more exclusive and delusional inner ranks of the NDP, James, in spite of being a "nice" person (well, not sure if that's still the case), is not the kind of leader the majority of people are looking for now. Two strikes out already. Politics are a cruel mistress, suck it up princess and do the right thing. Time for the old blood to give way to the new, or suffer the fate of all out of touch cabal's, well, they already are - bloody regime change, and devastating loss. It's time for some real, strategic change in the NDP.

The NDP is also currently offering next to nothing for actual policy, or a platform from which to challenge the BC Liberal record. Or a true blue honest opinion. People want to know what they stand for. Pick an informed and principled opinion and stick to it. It's not that bloody hard and it's what earns respect from voters.

From a logical standpoint, this isn't just one off stuff, here are a number of incidents and events that have occurred during the time of Ms. James' leadership:
  • Michael Sathers was expelled from the NDP caucus.
  • Moe Sihota was positioned as president of the NDP and then it was learned money collected from donors was going to pay him for the pleasure of ruining the party, er, I meant running, yes, that's right.
  • Bob Simpson, NDP MLA for was kicked out of caucus, without the proper process being followed, for the mildest and hardly an earth shattering opinion - Carole James speech (pick one), was uninspired and lacked detail. Yes, any reasonable person can see he was way too harsh on James. Oh puhleeze, this is politics, remember, blood sport.
  • Norm Macdonald, resigned as NDP Caucus Chair over the handling of the Simpson affair.
  • Katrine Controy quit her position as Caucus Whip of the NDP. And she had the support of other MLA's, including Jenny Kwan, Lana Popham and Claire Trevena.
Sometimes, as painful as they are, breakups are best. All of those sappy self-help books say you can grow from your pain. And then start again with someone else, a little more battle weary, some more baggage, but ready to move on. That's where the citizens of BC find themselves, staring with astonishment at the train wreck break ups happening inside of both parties, with no viable third party alternative yet in the game.

I've got the perfect new tourism slogan:

Welcome to BC: The Banana Republic of the North.